https://redmine.pfsense.org/
https://redmine.pfsense.org/favicon.ico?1678052116
2021-04-27T02:23:19Z
pfSense bugtracker
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53194
2021-04-27T02:23:19Z
Viktor Gurov
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>21.05</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Affected Version</strong> set to <i>2.5.0</i></li></ul><p>An MD5 key is a string of 20 random printable ASCII characters,<br />while a SHA key is a string of 40 random hex digits.<br />from <a class="external" href="https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ntp-keygen&apropos=0&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current&format=html">https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ntp-keygen&apropos=0&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current&format=html</a></p>
<p>fix:<br /><a class="external" href="https://gitlab.netgate.com/pfSense/pfSense/-/merge_requests/224">https://gitlab.netgate.com/pfSense/pfSense/-/merge_requests/224</a></p>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53200
2021-04-27T08:26:38Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Pull Request Review</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>2.6.0</i></li></ul>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53445
2021-05-11T12:18:01Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Pull Request Review</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>PR was merged yesterday.</p>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53558
2021-05-11T15:43:32Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Plus Target Version</strong> set to <i>21.05</i></li></ul>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53571
2021-05-11T15:48:44Z
Jim Pingle
<ul></ul><p>Already in 21.05 branch.</p>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53747
2021-05-13T08:39:44Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>NTP Authentication key for SHA1 digest </i> to <i>NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys</i></li></ul><p>Updating subject for release notes.</p>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=53783
2021-05-15T04:31:54Z
Thomas Paetzold
<ul></ul><p>Jim Pingle wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Updating subject for release notes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As I'm still on the 21.02.2-RELEASE (amd64) - when could I expect the 21.05 to be rolled out?</p>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=54116
2021-05-27T07:56:31Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>2.6.0</i> to <i>2.5.2</i></li></ul>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=54129
2021-05-27T08:45:49Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> changed from <i>Authentication</i> to <i>NTPD</i></li></ul>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=54266
2021-06-02T13:26:46Z
Jim Pingle
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=54532
2021-06-16T07:52:00Z
Renato Botelho
renato@netgate.com
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Viktor Gurov</i></li></ul>
pfSense - Bug #11850: NTP authentication input validation rejects valid keys
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11850?journal_id=54569
2021-06-17T08:02:29Z
Thomas Paetzold
<ul></ul><p>Thanks the effort made. <br />Just want to confirm: in <strong>21.05-RELEASE</strong> it works now as expected.</p>