Project

General

Profile

Bug #4235

missing 'reply-to' in rules for mobile-ipsec

Added by Pi Ba almost 5 years ago. Updated over 4 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
IPsec
Target version:
Start date:
01/18/2015
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Affected Version:
All
Affected Architecture:
All

Description

It seem 'reply-to' is missing in firewall rules generated for mobile-ipsec.

Associated revisions

Revision 620c4df1 (diff)
Added by Ermal Luçi over 4 years ago

Ticket #4235 put reply-to/route-to rules even for mobile-ipsec.

Revision c26de127 (diff)
Added by Ermal Luçi over 4 years ago

Ticket #4235 put reply-to/route-to rules even for mobile-ipsec.

History

#1 Updated by Chris Buechler almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Confirmed
  • Target version changed from 2.2 to 2.2.1
  • Affected Version changed from 2.2 to All

there have never been any accommodations for mobile IPsec in that regard

#2 Updated by Chris Buechler almost 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2

#3 Updated by Chris Buechler over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3

#4 Updated by Ermal Luçi over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Feedback

This should be fixed.
Though to be checked if only reply-to is desired instead of both reply-to and route-to being generated.

#5 Updated by Chris Buechler over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

works. having route-to and reply-to the way it is now is fine.

Also available in: Atom PDF