Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #4235

closed

missing 'reply-to' in rules for mobile-ipsec

Added by Pi Ba almost 7 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
IPsec
Target version:
Start date:
01/18/2015
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
All
Affected Architecture:
All

Description

It seem 'reply-to' is missing in firewall rules generated for mobile-ipsec.

Actions #1

Updated by Chris Buechler almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Confirmed
  • Target version changed from 2.2 to 2.2.1
  • Affected Version changed from 2.2 to All

there have never been any accommodations for mobile IPsec in that regard

Actions #2

Updated by Chris Buechler over 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2
Actions #3

Updated by Chris Buechler over 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3
Actions #4

Updated by Ermal Luçi over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Confirmed to Feedback

This should be fixed.
Though to be checked if only reply-to is desired instead of both reply-to and route-to being generated.

Actions #5

Updated by Chris Buechler over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

works. having route-to and reply-to the way it is now is fine.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF