https://redmine.pfsense.org/https://redmine.pfsense.org/favicon.ico?16780521162018-06-24T01:31:08ZpfSense bugtrackerpfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=367742018-06-24T01:31:08Zxavier Lemairexavier@amassi-network.com
<ul><li><strong>File</strong> <a href="/attachments/2480">patch-mtu</a> <a class="icon-only icon-download" title="Download" href="/attachments/download/2480/patch-mtu">patch-mtu</a> added</li></ul><p><a class="external" href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/#b64c">https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/#b64c</a></p>
<p>A patch to try</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=367752018-06-24T06:34:46Zxavier Lemairexavier@amassi-network.com
<ul></ul><p>It s work for me</p>
<p><a class="external" href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/#7142">https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/#7142</a></p>
<p>Eugene Grosbein make a binary <a class="external" href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/#7142">https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/#7142</a></p>
<p>They are going to put the patch it to next revision of mpd5.</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=367772018-06-24T08:23:47Zxavier Lemairexavier@amassi-network.com
<ul></ul><p>Eugene Grosbein - 29 minutes ago</p>
<p>I have just updated FreeBSD's net/mpd5 port up to revision 5.8_4 that contains this fix:<br /><a class="external" href="https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/473194">https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/473194</a></p>
<p>I do not use pfSense myself. You can now inform pfSense developers of this update so they could upgrade their copy of mpd5.</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=373932018-07-31T16:08:12ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>pfSense Packages</i> to <i>pfSense</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Renato Botelho</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>2.4.4</i></li></ul> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=373942018-07-31T16:09:22ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>PPP Interfaces</i></li></ul><p>This patch reached pfSense 2.4.4 development and introduced a different error. I updated original mpd ticket and would like to get it addressed before 2.4.4 is released</p>
<p>Details at <a class="external" href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/">https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/62/</a></p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=373972018-08-01T01:10:19Zxavier Lemairexavier@amassi-network.com
<ul></ul><p>Hi Renato,</p>
<p>Look like a different trouble... Eugene is very reactive. Do you try to fixe 1480 MTU and MRU in your conf because i see 1492.<br />I see a very strange 1600 too in your log. I tested 2.4.4 in different cases but not all. please let me know that I re-test as soon as you have new mpd binary</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=374002018-08-01T06:01:19ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul></ul><p>xavier Lemaire wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Hi Renato,</p>
<p>Look like a different trouble... Eugene is very reactive. Do you try to fixe 1480 MTU and MRU in your conf because i see 1492.<br />I see a very strange 1600 too in your log. I tested 2.4.4 in different cases but not all. please let me know that I re-test as soon as you have new mpd binary</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I opened a new ticket - <a class="external" href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/63/">https://sourceforge.net/p/mpd/bugs/63/</a> - with all details. If I remove the `set link mtu 1492` it ends up with 1492 anyway and the problem persists. Forcing it to 1480 fixes the problem.</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=374862018-08-03T10:20:07ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul><p>Applied in changeset <a class="changeset" title="Fix #8595 Implement MTU override option that allow client to force a bigger MTU value than the o..." href="https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/4da0767b978b5b93e6bf6556e8edd323af7ca3d4">4da0767b978b5b93e6bf6556e8edd323af7ca3d4</a>.</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=374872018-08-03T11:06:35ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul></ul><p>A new round of snapshots of 2.4.4 are ready for testing.</p> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=375102018-08-04T11:30:32Zxavier Lemairexavier@amassi-network.com
<ul></ul><p>thank you ! sorry for the lag... running the last version</p>
<p>FreeBSD pfSense.xxxxxxx 11.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE <a class="issue tracker-1 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="Bug: pfsense 7.2 / 2.0 build issue (Resolved)" href="https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/48">#48</a> cd0e4c8cf25(RELENG_2_4_4): Fri Aug 3 11:21:26 EDT 2018 root@buildbot3:/builder/crossbuild-ce-master/obj/amd64/FWJoMRHc/builder/crossbuild-ce-master/pfSense/tmp/FreeBSD-src/sys/pfSense amd64</p>
<p>Without using mtu overide option look very good !!!</p>
<p>pppoe0: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492</p>
<p>cat /var/etc/mpd_wan.conf <br />startup:
# configure the console<br /> set console close
# configure the web server<br /> set web close</p>
<p>default:<br />pppoeclient:<br /> create bundle static wan<br /> set bundle enable ipv6cp<br /> set iface name pppoe0<br /> set iface disable on-demand<br /> set iface idle 0<br /> set iface enable tcpmssfix<br /> set iface up-script /usr/local/sbin/ppp-linkup<br /> set iface down-script /usr/local/sbin/ppp-linkdown<br /> set ipcp ranges 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0<br /> #log -bund -ccp -chat -iface -ipcp -lcp -link</p>
<pre><code>create link static wan_link0 pppoe<br /> set link action bundle wan<br /> set link disable multilink<br /> set link keep-alive 10 60<br /> set link max-redial 0<br /> set link disable chap pap<br /> set link accept chap pap eap<br /> set link disable incoming<br /> set link mtu 1492<br /> set auth authname "xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <br /> set auth password xxxxxxxx<br /> set pppoe service "" <br /> set pppoe iface em0<br /> open</code></pre> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=375132018-08-06T05:39:44ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul> pfSense - Bug #8595: Maybe a new mpd5-x+1 MTU ISSUE WITH ORANGE FRhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8595?journal_id=375142018-08-06T05:39:58ZRenato Botelhorenato@netgate.com
<ul><li><strong>Tracker</strong> changed from <i>Feature</i> to <i>Bug</i></li></ul>