https://redmine.pfsense.org/https://redmine.pfsense.org/favicon.ico?16780521162010-09-10T07:18:57ZpfSense bugtrackerpfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=31822010-09-10T07:18:57ZJim Pingle
<ul></ul><p>As discovered in this thread: <a class="external" href="http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,27910.msg146548.html#msg146548">http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,27910.msg146548.html#msg146548</a></p>
<p>The time rendering issue seems to only happen between 12am and 12pm, so if you check it after noon, the graphs are OK and you can't reproduce the issue.</p>
<p>Error message from the thread (and mine is similar if I check it before noon)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Sep 10 00:40:13 php: /status_rrd_graph_img.php: Failed to create graph with error code 1, the error is: ERROR: start (1284120000) should be less than end (1284093613)/usr/bin/nice -n20 /usr/local/bin/rrdtool graph /tmp/GW_WAN-quality.rrd-12hour.png \ --start 1284120000 --end 1284093613 \ --title "`hostname` - GW_WAN :: Quality - 7 hours - 1 minute average" \ --color SHADEA#eeeeee --color SHADEB#eeeeee \ --vertical-label "ms / <span>" \ --height 200 --width 620 \ --lower-limit 0 \ DEF:delayraw=/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN-quality.rrd:delay:AVERAGE \ DEF:loss=/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN-quality.rrd:loss:AVERAGE \ "CDEF:delay=delayraw,1000,*" \ "CDEF:roundavg=delay,<abbr title="delay">PREV</abbr>,+,2,/" \ "CDEF:loss10=loss,-1,*" \ "CDEF:r0=delay,20,MIN" \ "CDEF:r1=delay,60,MIN" \ "CDEF:r2=delay,180,MIN" \ "CDEF:r3=delay,420,MIN" \ COMMENT:" Delay Packet loss\n" \ AREA:delay#990000:"> 420 ms" \ GPRINT:delay:MIN:" Min\: %7.2lf ms" \ GPRINT:loss:MIN:" Min\: %3.1lf %</span>\n" \ AREA:r3#a83c3c:"180-420</p>
</blockquote> pfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=31862010-09-11T02:09:11ZJonathan Puddleit.toronto@catchthefire.com
<ul></ul><p>We're seeing this too. Our RRD graphs were fine up until yesterday's release.</p> pfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=31902010-09-12T16:34:22ZSeth Mosseth.mos@dds.nl
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Seth Mos</i></li></ul><p>I've disabled the 12 hour timespan graph for now. I'll have to look into it later.</p> pfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=43072010-12-20T17:37:57ZSeth Mosseth.mos@dds.nl
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li></ul><p>in place of the 12 hour timespan I've made the 8hour timespan instead, which is easier to craft. This also has to do with <a class="issue tracker-1 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" title="Bug: RRD graph time axis not locked to latest times with higher average samples (Resolved)" href="https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/812">#812</a></p>
<p>Needs feedback</p> pfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=43482010-12-22T11:51:10ZAdam Stylinskikungfujesus06@gmail.com
<ul></ul><p>hmm, the quality RRD doesn't seem to be working recently, although for entirely different reasons I'm sure.</p> pfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=66182011-08-05T14:42:23ZDaniel Jampendaniel@jampen.net
<ul></ul><p>All RRD graphs are working fine @ Pfsense nanobsd 1G 2.0-RC3 (i386) built on Wed Aug 3 20:04:02 EDT 2011</p> pfSense - Bug #886: RRD graph generation time scaling not written correctlyhttps://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/886?journal_id=67002011-08-13T23:15:04ZChris Buechlercbuechler@gmail.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul>