Project

General

Profile

Search

Results (245)

Regression #12233 (Resolved): VIP network addresses are not expanded on Port Forward rules
On 2.4.5p1, it was possible to select an auto ... Type Other | Address type Network | Address 10.0.0.0/29@ # Create a NAT Port Forward rule On version 21.05.1 @Destination drop-down list only shows 10.0.0.0@ On version 2.4.5p1 @Destination drop-down list shows 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.0.7 and "Subnet: 10.0.0.0/29"@ 08/08/2021 04:12 PM
Bug #12155 (Resolved): Tunnels with conflicti ... n lead to multiple identical Child SA entries
Testing in 21.05 and 21.09 it's possible to c ... tart remote_ts = 10.66.10.2,0.0.0.0/0 local_ts = 10.66.10.1,0.0.0.0/0 reqid = 1 ... 1.0/24|/0 === 192.168.126.0/24|/0 </pre> 07/21/2021 08:41 AM
Feature #12092 (Closed): Utilize new ``pfctl`` abilities to kill states
In the latest pf changes present on 2.6.0, @p ... uld at least note it somewhere in the docs. 06/29/2021 09:18 AM
Bug #12015 (Not a Bug): When using VMware Fus ... se IPSEC, no routes are going thru the tunnel
So I have a virtualized lab setup that has to ... l traffic is to be routed thru the tunnel. (0.0.0.0/0) If I setup the Networking to be NAT'd ... e verified this behavior on 2.4.5p1 and 2.5.1 06/08/2021 07:53 PM
Regression #11910 (Resolved): IPsec status tunnel descriptions are incorrect
Moving from internal Redmine since this affec ... ight reverse mapping when doing the status. 05/12/2021 08:00 AM
Regression #11839 (Closed): Panic on 21.05/2.6.0 snapshots when memory usage is high
On several systems (hardware and VMs) running ... pen to be what it was busy doing at the time. 04/22/2021 09:03 AM
Bug #11761 (New): L2TP/IPsec VPN : PPP LCP negotiation occurs before user authentication
We are using pfSense to provide a l2tp/ipsec ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRIDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRINBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECNBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] I ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRINBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECNBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] I ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRIDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECDNS ... 03/31/2021 04:52 AM
Regression #11751 (Closed): Input validation prevents creating 1:1 NAT rules on IPsec
Additional input validation in the GUI in 21. ... 2.5. Specifically if the P2 in use carries 0.0.0.0/0 it will carry the NAT'd traffic still. ... 04:00 EDT 2021 FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE </pre> 03/29/2021 09:41 AM
Bug #11734 (Resolved): NAT rule overlap detection is inconsistent
When saving an additional NAT port forward ru ... eing saved when a destination mask is defined 03/26/2021 05:24 PM
Bug #11707 (Duplicate): IPv4 /8 or above Static routing uses aliases
When I delete the previously set static route using aliases 1.0.0.0/8 and 110.0.0.0/7 via wan,and also manually updated the stat ... ttings have not changed test system pf2.6 03/20/2021 06:38 AM
(61-70/245)