Regression #14690
closed
Creating or duplicating an IPsec P1 entry does not increment the IKE ID
Added by Clinton Cory 9 months ago.
Updated 6 months ago.
Plus Target Version:
23.09
Release Notes:
Force Exclusion
Description
pfSense 23.09-DEV build from today
VPN -> IPSec. I select the button to "copy phase 1 entry" for a P1 I created. The P1 and P2s are copied to a new entry but the same Connection ID (1) is used. This results in only being able to view the most recent copy under IPSec -> Status. If I disable the copy, and enable the original P1, it does not show up under IPSec -> Status. If I disable the original and enable the copy, I can see it under IPSec -> Status.
- Project changed from pfSense Plus to pfSense
- Subject changed from IPSec "copy phase 1 entry" - duplicate connection ID to IPsec "Copy phase 1 entry" function copies the IKE ID which should be unique
- Category changed from IPsec to IPsec
- Assignee set to Jim Pingle
- Target version changed from 23.09 to 2.8.0
- Affected Plus Version deleted (
23.09)
- Plus Target Version set to 23.09
Not specific to plus, happens on CE as well.
- Subject changed from IPsec "Copy phase 1 entry" function copies the IKE ID which should be unique to Creating or duplicating an IPsec P1 entry does not increment the IKE ID
- Status changed from New to In Progress
It's worse than that, even creating a new tunnel from scratch has a duplicate ID.
- Tracker changed from Bug to Regression
- Affected Version set to 2.8.0
This regressed after the last release. It's OK on 23.05.1 and 2.7.0, but broken in the current code. Looks like a variable name change was made and then a later change unintentionally reverted just one of the lines to the old name.
Fix coming momentarily.
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Release Notes changed from Default to Force Exclusion
Excluding from release notes since it was never a problem in a release version.
Tested on
23.09-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
built on Wed Aug 23 06:05:57 UTC 2023
FreeBSD 14.0-ALPHA2
The issue does not occur on the fresh build.
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- Target version changed from 2.8.0 to 2.7.1
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by 
Updated by