Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #3309

closed

wrong routing on multidsl+multiopenvpn

Added by Federico Viel about 11 years ago. Updated about 11 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
OpenVPN
Target version:
Start date:
11/07/2013
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
2.1
Affected Architecture:

Description

In a multidsl enviroment with 1Server and 2 (or more) site2site OpenVPN clients the 2nd one does not route correctly.
Look to the pictures: on the routing table remote lans have got the same gw (and netif), but different traceroute behavior.

Disabling multigw on fw pass LAN rule solves the problem.


Files

routes 2.1-RELEASE.JPG (157 KB) routes 2.1-RELEASE.JPG Federico Viel, 11/07/2013 09:14 AM
tracert.JPG (88.4 KB) tracert.JPG Federico Viel, 11/07/2013 09:14 AM
Actions #1

Updated by Federico Viel about 11 years ago

Further digging found out the following:

pfSense code does not list all vpn_networks in <vpn_networks> variable as you can see from /tmp/rules.debug
2.1-RC1 (online: production fw)
....
table <vpn_networks> { 10.106.100.0/24 192.168.11.0/24 10.106.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 10.116.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.21.0/24 10.106.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 10.116.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 }
table <negate_networks> { 10.106.100.0/24 192.168.11.0/24 10.106.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 10.116.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.21.0/24 10.106.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 10.116.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 }
....

2.1-RELEASE (offline: test machine with just lan netif up)
...
table <vpn_networks> { 10.116.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.21.0/24}
table <negate_networks> { 10.116.100.0/24 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.21.0/24}
....

(In 2.1-RC1 it works)

Actions #3

Updated by Renato Botelho about 11 years ago

  • Category set to OpenVPN
  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Target version set to 2.1.1

Pull request was merged, could you confirm that it fixed the issue?

Actions #4

Updated by Federico Viel about 11 years ago

yes, I do!
I tested the fix on 2.1-RELEASE and now both VPNS work.

Actions #5

Updated by Renato Botelho about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF