Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #9149

closed

Continued issues with /tmp and /var in RAM on 2.4

Added by Art Manion over 5 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
Package System
Target version:
-
Start date:
11/24/2018
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Force Exclusion
Affected Version:
2.4.x
Affected Architecture:
amd64

Description

I've had repeated trouble with upgrades and even non-upgrade-related reboots with pkg configuration. 2.3.5 through 2.4.2, CE (on both a PC and a Protectli FW6A) and a Netgate build (on a SG-4860).

Similar symptoms to this ticket, however no ZFS involved:

https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/6906

pkg and pkg-static return no output, GUI can't report upgrade or package status/lists.

symlinks were a recursive mess, I don't have all the details but for example:

file /var/db/pkg/pkg
/var/db/pkg/pkg: broken symbolic link to ../../root/var/db/pkg

/root/var/db/pkg was also a symlink to ../../root/var/db/pkg, similar issues for /var/cache/pkg and /root/var/cache/pkg.

Boxes would sometimes hang on reboot, needed to Ctrl-C on console.

At least one occurrence was confounded by this PHP upgrade issue, which occurred after a successful upgrade to 2.4.4:

https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/install/upgrade-guide.html#version-specific-notes
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135868/php-errors-after-upgrade-to-2-4-4

I've disabled using RAM for /var and /tmp recently and have had no further issues, however these are production devices and I'm going to test by observing normal operation (upgrades and reboots) over time.

To reproduce:

Configure /var to live in memory. Perform "normal" upgrades and reboots.

I realize this isn't a easy to repro ticket and I don't have a proposed code fix, I'm mainly filing in case others have observed similar behavior. My guess is there's some sort of race with /var in RAM, on non-ZFS systems. I looked at pfSense-rc a little but don't see anything obvious.

Actions #1

Updated by Christian McDonald over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected
  • Release Notes set to Force Exclusion

RAM disk implementation has been worked on quite a bit. This is very likely to be irrelevant at this point.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF