Bug #9307
closedVirtual Address Pool in Pre-Shared Keys is not used
0%
Description
For most of my road warriors, I want to have different firewall rules than for e.g. me.
Therefore, I assigned a default Virtual Address Pool of 192.168.6.0/24 and for my account, I used 192.168.7.0/24
This is also added to ipsec.conf correctly. However, my (Windows 10) client still gets a 192.168.6.x IP.
Content of /var/etc/ipsec/ipsec.conf:
# This file is automatically generated. Do not edit
config setup
uniqueids = yes
conn bypasslan
leftsubnet = 10.8.0.0/16
rightsubnet = 10.8.0.0/16
authby = never
type = passthrough
auto = route
conn con-mobile
fragmentation = yes
keyexchange = ikev2
reauth = yes
forceencaps = no
mobike = yes
rekey = yes
installpolicy = yes
type = tunnel
dpdaction = clear
dpddelay = 10s
dpdtimeout = 60s
auto = add
left = 145.REMOVED...
right = %any
leftid = fqdn:test.REMOVED
ikelifetime = 28800s
lifetime = 3600s
rightsourceip = 192.168.6.0/24
rightdns = 10.8.1.11
ike = aes256-sha384-ecp384!
esp = aes256-sha256-ecp384,aes256-sha384-ecp384!
eap_identity=%any
leftauth=pubkey
rightauth=eap-mschapv2
leftcert=/var/etc/ipsec/ipsec.d/certs/cert-1.crt
leftsendcert=always
leftsubnet = 10.8.0.0/16
conn mobile-1
also = con-mobile
eap_identity = email:REMOVED
rightsourceip = 192.168.7.0/24
rightid = email:REMOVED
What am I doing wrong or is there a bug? Thanks...
(See also Feature #8292)
Updated by Jim Pingle almost 7 years ago
- Status changed from New to Not a Bug
Probably a configuration issue or it isn't matching the identifier as expected. Post on the forum unless a specific bug can be identified and replicated there.
Updated by Florian K. almost 7 years ago
Additional observation:
- On the status page under "Leases", it shows both pools, but 192.168.7.0 is never used.
- I also tried 192.168.7.1/32, but this didn't work either.
- When I disable "virtual address pool" in "Mobile Clients", Windows 10 says: "Invalid Payload received".
Updated by Florian K. almost 7 years ago
Jim Pingle wrote:
Probably a configuration issue or it isn't matching the identifier as expected. Post on the forum unless a specific bug can be identified and replicated there.
ok I'll try there