Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #9578

closed

Zebra Doesn't detect VIP on lo0 has been removed

Added by Nick Fisk over 5 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:
Not a Bug
Priority:
Very Low
Assignee:
Category:
FRR
Target version:
-
Start date:
06/07/2019
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Affected Version:
2.4.4-p3
Affected Plus Version:
Affected Architecture:

Description

I am using FRR to advertise IP's located on lo0. Previously when using the Quagga package, when changing a VIP to a different IP, it was removed from the Zebra and BGP tables.

After upgrading to FRR I am seeing that both the old and new IP's are still in Zebra and thus being advertised as connected routes to neighbours.

Example: (old IP=185.68.1.250, New IP=185.68.2.50)

root: netstat -rn
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire
default 192.168.99.2 UG1 vmx0
10.254.1.0/24 link#2 U vmx1
10.254.1.250 link#2 UHS lo0
127.0.0.1 link#4 UH lo0
185.68.2.50 link#4 UH lo0
192.168.99.0/24 link#1 U vmx0
192.168.99.50 link#1 UHS lo0

Hello, this is FRRouting (version 6.0.2).
Copyright 1996-2005 Kunihiro Ishiguro, et al.

sh ip route
Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP,
O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP,
T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, D - SHARP,
F - PBR,
> - selected route, * - FIB route

B>* 0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 192.168.99.2, vmx0, 00:03:35
C>* 10.254.1.0/24 is directly connected, vmx1, 02:37:46
C>* 185.68.1.250/32 is directly connected, lo0, 02:37:46
C>* 185.68.2.50/32 is directly connected, lo0, 00:03:38
C>* 192.168.99.0/24 is directly connected, vmx0, 02:37:46

Actions #1

Updated by Jim Pingle over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Not a Bug
  • Priority changed from Normal to Very Low

I don't believe there is anything we can do here. That's between FRR and the OS.

You could try a 2.5.0 snapshot which uses FRR 7, it may behave differently.

Otherwise it may take a restart of FRR to make it recognize the change of addresses.

You might be able to make it happen manually by using vtysh to "remove" the address, but there won't be any way to make a similar action on pfSense automatically. There isn't any mechanism for a VIP action to trigger a reaction from a package.

Your best course of action would be to try it on FRR 7, and if it's still a problem, report it to FRR.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF