Actions
Bug #10260
closed"cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads" alert after 2.4.5rc1 update
Status:
Duplicate
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Operating System
Target version:
-
Start date:
02/14/2020
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
2.4.5
Affected Architecture:
Description
I was running a nightly build of 2.4.5 from a few weeks ago (sorry forget which) and last night I updated to 2.4.5rc1
I got an alert with the following:
Filter Reload
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:34:44
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:34:50
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:35:00
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:35:05
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:35:12
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:36:55
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:02
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:07
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:09
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:11
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
@ 2020-02-13 22:37:16
I assume this message indicates some kind of bug, but not sure what.
Also, it's clearly not (un)escaping something properly, as those < appeared literally/visually like that.
Updated by Sean McBride about 4 years ago
ha, redmine has gone and interpreted that output, let me see if I can get it to appear literally how it was:
I was running a nightly build of 2.4.5 from a few weeks ago (sorry forget which) and last night I updated to 2.4.5rc1 I got an alert with the following: Filter Reload There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:34:44 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:34:50 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:35:00 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:35:05 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:35:12 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:36:55 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:37:02 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:37:07 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:37:09 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:37:11 There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6" @ 2020-02-13 22:37:16
Updated by Sean McBride about 4 years ago
Ok, that's better. Those < > and " were literally in the output that I saw.
Updated by Jim Pingle about 4 years ago
- Category set to Operating System
- Status changed from New to Duplicate
Duplicate of #10254
Actions