Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #10260

closed

"cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads" alert after 2.4.5rc1 update

Added by Sean McBride about 4 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Duplicate
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Operating System
Target version:
-
Start date:
02/14/2020
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
2.4.5
Affected Architecture:

Description

I was running a nightly build of 2.4.5 from a few weeks ago (sorry forget which) and last night I updated to 2.4.5rc1

I got an alert with the following:

Filter Reload

There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:34:44
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:34:50
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
2020-02-13 22:35:00
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:35:05
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:35:12
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:36:55
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:02
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:07
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:09
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
2020-02-13 22:37:11
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table <bogonsv6> persist file "/etc/bogonsv6"
@ 2020-02-13 22:37:16

I assume this message indicates some kind of bug, but not sure what.

Also, it's clearly not (un)escaping something properly, as those &lt appeared literally/visually like that.

Actions #1

Updated by Sean McBride about 4 years ago

ha, redmine has gone and interpreted that output, let me see if I can get it to appear literally how it was:

I was running a nightly build of 2.4.5 from a few weeks ago (sorry forget which) and last night I updated to 2.4.5rc1

I got an alert with the following:

Filter Reload

    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:34:44
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:34:50
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:35:00
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:35:05
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:35:12
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:36:55
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:37:02
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:37:07
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:37:09
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:37:11
    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table bogonsv6: Invalid argument - The line in question reads [20]: table &lt;bogonsv6&gt; persist file &quot;/etc/bogonsv6&quot;
    @ 2020-02-13 22:37:16
Actions #2

Updated by Sean McBride about 4 years ago

Ok, that's better. Those &lt &gt and &quot were literally in the output that I saw.

Actions #3

Updated by Jim Pingle about 4 years ago

  • Category set to Operating System
  • Status changed from New to Duplicate

Duplicate of #10254

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF