Actions
Bug #1039
closed
Error on Syncronisation slave - DIOCADDRULE: Device busy
Start date:
11/24/2010
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
2.0
Affected Architecture:
Description
On 10 - 30 % of config synchronisations to a slave machine we
get a notification from the slave:
There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy The line in question reads [ DIOCADDRULE]:
Here are the log entries:
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was 'pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy'
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was 'pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy'
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was 'pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy'
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was 'pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy'
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : New alert found: There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy The line in question reads [ DIOCADDRULE]:
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : New alert found: There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy The line in question reads [ DIOCADDRULE]:
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : Message sent to root@progra.de OK
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : Message sent to root@progra.de OK
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy - The line in question reads [ DIOCADDRULE]:
Nov 24 18:46:28 gwb php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy - The line in question reads [ DIOCADDRULE]:
Updated by
Updated by Ermal Luçi about 14 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
Possible fix committed.
Updated by Martin Klein about 14 years ago
I am sorry to say but on a Tue Nov 30 02:04:03 EST 2010
Snapshot the problem is not fixed.
Updated by Ermal Luçi about 14 years ago
By any chance you have services like uPNP running?
Updated by Martin Klein about 14 years ago
We are not running uPNP.
We have a few filter and nat rules
and we are running the following services:
carp (5 Interfaces)
dnsmasq
ntpd
dhcpd
bsnmpd
openvpn
Updated by Ermal Luçi about 14 years ago
Please update to newer snapshots.
This should be fixed now.
Updated by Martin Klein about 14 years ago
On the Dec 7 snapshot
the problem seems to be fixed.
Thank You
Actions