Project

General

Profile

Feature #2386

Bridge member that is not an assigned interface

Added by Erik Fonnesbeck almost 9 years ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
Pull Request Review
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Viktor Gurov
Category:
Interfaces
Target version:
2.5.next
Start date:
04/19/2012
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

As suggested on #2385, a solution for bridge members showing up in unwanted places in the web GUI and the rule set would be to allow adding members that are not assigned interfaces. For this to work, something needs to be worked out for members that need some type of extra configuration (like wireless devices).

interface-assignments.png (91 KB) interface-assignments.png Screenshot of interface assignments. Ryan J, 04/25/2012 06:55 PM
bridges.png (84.1 KB) bridges.png Screenshot of bridge configurations. Ryan J, 04/25/2012 06:55 PM
rules.png (92.2 KB) rules.png Screenshot of firewall rules. Ryan J, 04/25/2012 06:55 PM
system-tunables.png (208 KB) system-tunables.png Screenshot of system tunables. Ryan J, 04/25/2012 06:55 PM

History

#1 Updated by Ryan J almost 9 years ago

I'm adding screenshots of a configuration I use that would benefit from this. For firewall rules, the only interfaces I'm interested in are LAN0 and LAN1. I never add any rules to LINK0, LINK1, WIFI0, or WIFI1. Right now the only reasons to assign those interfaces are so they can participate as bridge members and so the wireless interfaces can be configured.

#3 Updated by Renato Botelho about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Pull Request Review
  • Assignee set to Viktor Gurov
  • Target version changed from Future to 2.5.next

Also available in: Atom PDF