Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #4193

closed

libevent-2.0.so.5 symlink missing on 2.2 RC

Added by Marcello Silva Coutinho over 6 years ago. Updated about 6 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
01/08/2015
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
2.2
Affected Architecture:

Description

on 2.2 beta I have ldd /usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status with all libs ok
/usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status:
libsbuf.so.6 => /lib/libsbuf.so.6 (0x80084c000)
libevent-2.0.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libevent-2.0.so.5 (0x800a4f000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c91000)
libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801023000)

But on 2.2 RC built on Thu Jan 08 03:14:18 CST 2015, ldd returns
/usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status:
libsbuf.so.6 => /lib/libsbuf.so.6 (0x80084c000)
libevent-2.0.so.5 => not found (0)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800a4f000)

a symlink just like it was used on 2.2 BETA fix the issue and check_reload_status get working and also all pf rules that packages like squid(for transparent proxy) creates

related forum post:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=84638.msg474145#msg474145

Actions #1

Updated by Jim Thompson over 6 years ago

  • Assignee set to Chris Buechler

Not seeing it.

[2.2-RC][admin@<Yeah, no>]/root: cat /etc/version*
2.2-RC
Thu Jan 08 19:13:15 CST 2015
d97dd424371014e766f63cbbffa0e92e0748f38e
[2.2-RC][admin@<Yeah, no>]/root: ldd /usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status
/usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status:
libsbuf.so.6 => /lib/libsbuf.so.6 (0x80084c000)
libevent-2.0.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libevent-2.0.so.5 (0x800a4f000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c91000)
libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801023000)

Might be related to the hung builder earlier today.

Actions #2

Updated by Chris Buechler over 6 years ago

  • Project changed from pfSense Packages to pfSense
  • Status changed from New to Rejected

it's there on 2.2-RC both 32 and 64 bit, nano and full. It's not a symlink and never has been. I double checked the obsoleted files list to make sure we weren't removing it and that's fine also. Given only 2 people have seen it that I can find, and both are messing with the squid3 files Marcello put out in the linked thread, seems it's something to do with that which blows away that file somehow.

Actions #3

Updated by Chris Buechler about 6 years ago

  • Target version deleted (2.2)
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF