Project

General

Profile

Search

Results (254)

Feature #12092 (Closed): Utilize new ``pfctl`` abilities to kill states
In the latest pf changes present on 2.6.0, @p ... uld at least note it somewhere in the docs. 06/29/2021 09:18 AM
Bug #12015 (Not a Bug): When using VMware Fus ... se IPSEC, no routes are going thru the tunnel
So I have a virtualized lab setup that has to ... l traffic is to be routed thru the tunnel. (0.0.0.0/0) If I setup the Networking to be NAT'd ... e verified this behavior on 2.4.5p1 and 2.5.1 06/08/2021 07:53 PM
Regression #11910 (Resolved): IPsec status tunnel descriptions are incorrect
Moving from internal Redmine since this affec ... ight reverse mapping when doing the status. 05/12/2021 08:00 AM
Regression #11839 (Closed): Panic on 21.05/2.6.0 snapshots when memory usage is high
On several systems (hardware and VMs) running ... pen to be what it was busy doing at the time. 04/22/2021 09:03 AM
Bug #11761 (New): L2TP/IPsec VPN : PPP LCP negotiation occurs before user authentication
We are using pfSense to provide a l2tp/ipsec ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRIDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRINBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECNBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] I ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRINBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECNBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] I ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRIDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECDNS ... 03/31/2021 04:52 AM
Regression #11751 (Closed): Input validation prevents creating 1:1 NAT rules on IPsec
Additional input validation in the GUI in 21. ... 2.5. Specifically if the P2 in use carries 0.0.0.0/0 it will carry the NAT'd traffic still. ... 04:00 EDT 2021 FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE </pre> 03/29/2021 09:41 AM
Bug #11734 (Resolved): NAT rule overlap detection is inconsistent
When saving an additional NAT port forward ru ... eing saved when a destination mask is defined 03/26/2021 05:24 PM
Bug #11707 (Duplicate): IPv4 /8 or above Static routing uses aliases
When I delete the previously set static route using aliases 1.0.0.0/8 and 110.0.0.0/7 via wan,and also manually updated the stat ... ttings have not changed test system pf2.6 03/20/2021 06:38 AM
Bug #11642 (Duplicate): IPSEC mode-cfg exchange refused because of invalid INTERNAL_IP4_NETMASK
Some clients, Forticlient is one, will reject ... this attribute and hence offers the default (0.0.0.0). This is not a valid netmask and therefore ... drs = 10.0.23.0/24 subnet = 0.0.0.0/0 split_include = 0.0.0.0/0 } mobile-pool-v6 : mobil ... drs = 10.0.23.0/24 subnet = 0.0.0.0/0 netmask = 255.255.255.255 split_include = 0.0.0.0/0 } I would suggest to fix thi ... g to open up a PR for the above minor change. 03/10/2021 02:41 AM
Bug #11629 (Resolved): PPPoE WAN IP address different than expected when set static by ISP
As per support ticket: #INC-77927 Hi, we'v ... om the router due to privacy, but can supply. 03/05/2021 08:03 AM
(71-80/254)