Search
Results (250)
- Regression #11839 (Closed): Panic on 21.05/2.6.0 snapshots when memory usage is high
- On several systems (hardware and VMs) running ... pen to be what it was busy doing at the time.
- Bug #11761 (New): L2TP/IPsec VPN : PPP LCP negotiation occurs before user authentication
- We are using pfSense to provide a l2tp/ipsec ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRIDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRINBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECNBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] I ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRINBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECNBNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] I ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] PRIDNS 0.0.0.0 Mar 31 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] ... 11:33:31 x.x.x.x l2tps: [l2tp_b-1] SECDNS ...
- Regression #11751 (Closed): Input validation prevents creating 1:1 NAT rules on IPsec
- Additional input validation in the GUI in 21. ... 2.5. Specifically if the P2 in use carries 0.0.0.0/0 it will carry the NAT'd traffic still. ... 04:00 EDT 2021 FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE </pre>
- Bug #11734 (Resolved): NAT rule overlap detection is inconsistent
- When saving an additional NAT port forward ru ... eing saved when a destination mask is defined
- Bug #11707 (Duplicate): IPv4 /8 or above Static routing uses aliases
- When I delete the previously set static route using aliases 1.0.0.0/8 and 110.0.0.0/7 via wan,and also manually updated the stat ... ttings have not changed test system pf2.6
- Bug #11642 (Duplicate): IPSEC mode-cfg exchange refused because of invalid INTERNAL_IP4_NETMASK
- Some clients, Forticlient is one, will reject ... this attribute and hence offers the default (0.0.0.0). This is not a valid netmask and therefore ... drs = 10.0.23.0/24 subnet = 0.0.0.0/0 split_include = 0.0.0.0/0 } mobile-pool-v6 : mobil ... drs = 10.0.23.0/24 subnet = 0.0.0.0/0 netmask = 255.255.255.255 split_include = 0.0.0.0/0 } I would suggest to fix thi ... g to open up a PR for the above minor change.
- Bug #11629 (Resolved): PPPoE WAN IP address different than expected when set static by ISP
- As per support ticket: #INC-77927 Hi, we'v ... om the router due to privacy, but can supply.
- Bug #11599 (Resolved): Modifying static route ... r, changes are not reflected in routing table
- When modifying an existing static route, e.g. ... ave an existing static route "Destination = 10.0.0.0/8, Gateway = 10.100.0.1, Flags = UGS, netif = hn0", then modify the Destination to 10.0.0.0/24 by GUI "System/Routing/Static Routes", an ... e original one and a new one "Destination = 10.0.0.0/24, Gateway = 10.100.0.1, Flags = UGS, netif = hn0".
- Bug #11569 (Resolved): ACLs generated from RADIUS reply attributes have incorrect syntax
- FreeRADIUS ACLs: <pre> Cisco-AVPair = "ip:inacl#1=permit tcp 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 any", Cisco-AVPair += "ip:inacl#2=permit tcp 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 10.10.128.151 0.0.0.0 eq 80", </pre> Created OpenVPN rules: < ... .1.1/32 to 10.10.128.151/32 port = 80 </pre>
- Bug #11552 (Resolved): Incorrect phase 2 entry removed when deleting multiple items consecutively
- I had a phase1 entry with 6 phase2 entries. ... ode Local Subnet Remote Subnet tunnel LAN 10.0.0.0/24 tunnel OPT1 10.0.0.0/24 tunnel LAN 10.0.1.0/24 tunnel OPT1 10 ... ode Local Subnet Remote Subnet tunnel LAN 10.0.0.0/24 tunnel LAN 10.0.1.0/24 tunnel OPT1 10 ... ode Local Subnet Remote Subnet tunnel LAN 10.0.0.0/24 tunnel OPT1 10.0.1.0/24 tunnel LAN 10 ... ted on 2.4.5-p1 and 2.5.0, both are affected.