Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #10952

open

Inconsistency in Subnet Defaults Between Firewall Rules and Interface Address Assignments

Added by Kris Phillips over 1 year ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
Rules / NAT
Target version:
-
Start date:
10/03/2020
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:
Affected Version:
2.4.5-p1
Affected Architecture:
All

Description

When creating a new firewall rule, after selecting "Network" under the source or destination fields, the field defaults to both the address and subnet fields being blank.

When assigning Static IPv4 or IPv6 addresses to a new interface, the address field is blank, but the subnet mask defaults to a single host subnet (/32 or /128 for IPv4 and IPv6 respectively). Since this represents inconsistency in the UI and since a /32 or /128 are rarely/never used for an interface, it would be helpful to default this to a blank field instead like it is in other drop down menus.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF