Bug #12527
closedDHCPv6 server does not skip interfaces configured with invalid ranges
100%
Files
Updated by Michael Lindman about 3 years ago
When configuring the DHCPv6 Server errors on other interfaces that break the DHCPv6 server as a whole are not detected or warned about in the user interface. I had an out of range subnet on one of my interfaces that wasn't noticed which stopped the DHCPv6 server from issuing addresses to clients on every other interface and was only noticed after looking at the DHCPv6 server logs which indicated an error on line 45 which was the out of range subnet.
Updated by Viktor Gurov about 3 years ago
- Affected Version set to 2.5.2
Updated by Jim Pingle about 3 years ago
- Target version set to CE-Next
- Plus Target Version set to 22.05
Updated by Jim Pingle about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Pull Request Review
- Assignee set to Viktor Gurov
Updated by Viktor Gurov almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from Pull Request Review to Feedback
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset 0c5cf0df3e2cba772482ad2ee5739725bd33e76f.
Updated by Jim Pingle almost 3 years ago
- Target version changed from CE-Next to 2.7.0
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
- Subject changed from DHCPv6 configuration doesn't detect errors on not configured interface to DHCPv6 server does not skip interfaces configured with invalid ranges
Updating subject for release notes.
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Assigned
- Assignee changed from Viktor Gurov to Jim Pingle
- Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
This caused a regression where it's skipping dhcp6 for delegated prefixes.
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
MR: https://gitlab.netgate.com/pfSense/pfSense/-/merge_requests/814
Patch is attached and fixes it for me here in my lab setup and for others testing internally.
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Feedback
Applied in changeset 3dc73d391eff61f490798696af78a4cdbeeeaf18.
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
Patch was tested successfully by multiple people internally, including several dynamic and static systems in my lab. Looks OK now.
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
If nobody else offers feedback before 22.05 releases, this is OK to close. The change appears to be solid but I'd like to test it again when it's in a build.
Updated by Danilo Zrenjanin over 2 years ago
The patch did the job.
Tested:
2.7.0-DEVELOPMENT (amd64) built on Wed Jun 01 06:12:27 UTC 2022 FreeBSD 12.3-STABLE
Updated by Jim Pingle over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Works on latest internal test snapshot.