Bug #1993
closed
- Subject changed from Unmonitored gateways are considered down to Unmonitored gateways cause wrong route-to
Not sure what sort of interface configuration this applies to.
Setting up a tripple DHCP now
Ok. When I configure 3 DHCP entries I can only add the 1st as a editable entry on the gateways page. That's not supposed to happen. fixed edit page Bogus code that removes any system entries without settings, seems like a sane thing to do but does not take disabled monitor into account. Removing code snippet.
Add to the return_gateways_status() function so that unmonitored gateways are shown as up with 0 latency and loss.
*replicated. Issue in filter.inc. http://tinypaste.com/a7f2c466
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Target version set to 2.0.1
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Estimated time set to 4.00 h
- Affected Architecture All added
- Affected Architecture deleted (
It appears that fixing the backend functions resolves the incorrect filter rule generation.
Also fixed a issue where a numerical gateway group would not be reffered to in the filter code. Array_merge() clobbers the number to 0 invalidating the rest of the code path. Thus it would never end up in the filter rules.
This fix should probably be included in 2.1 as well.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by 
Updated by