Actions
Bug #8996
closedpfBlockerNG not like CloudFlare DNS
Status:
Bogus
Priority:
Very High
Assignee:
-
Category:
pfBlockerNG
Target version:
-
Start date:
10/03/2018
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Affected Version:
All
Affected Plus Version:
Affected Architecture:
All
Description
Hi all, pfBlockerNG use IP 1.1.1.1 is list of IPs is NULL, so any time list is null CloudFlare DNS can be banned, filtered or even allowed (if filter elsewhere used as native) to illegal info. Could this fixed by creating logic about that NULL list must be not created? Or if not - could it point to one of test supnets described in RFC 5737: 192.0.2.0/24 198.51.100.0/24 203.0.113.0/24 and for IPv6 list to 2001:db8::/32 as RFC 3849 "Addresses used in documentation and example source code". Thank you.
Actions