IPsec error, racoon won't start with more than one phase 2
Mobile IPsec connection with more than one Phase 2 connections create an invalid /var/etc/racoon.conf file that prevents the racoon service from starting. May apply to other Phase 1's other than Mobile, but I didn't test. Dec. 18th (current) builds for i386 (not confirmed on other architectures) and past few days to a week or so (unsure exactly when it started, could be a bit longer) have the problem at least. Logs, racoon.conf, and <ipsec> tag from config.xml examples from machine with error are all at http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,31255.0.html.
Confirmed that deleting all but one Phase 2 tunnel allows racoon to start and VPN works normally. However the multiple-phase-2 version of the config was working fine in the past; upgrading to a newer snapshot broke it, without any additional configuration changes (to the IPsec area) being made.
#1 Updated by Pierre POMES almost 9 years ago
Note : the bug seems to be in /etc/inc/vpn.inc, line 640:
640 if (($localid_type == "none") || 641 (($ph1ent['authentication_method'] == "xauth_psk_server") || 642 ($ph1ent['authentication_method'] == "pre_shared_key")) 643 && isset($ph1ent['mobile'])) 644 $localid_spec = " ";
This is causing several "sainfo" section without any local specification ==> duplicate sainfo when more then one phase2.
#3 Updated by Pierre POMES over 8 years ago
I check the code a little, we can have "sainfo anonymous" when setting the phase2 to "transport". So for such mobiles, it could be a documented issue in the wiki (only use one phase II in transport mode for such devices), and we could remove the condition (on isset($ph1ent['mobile']) in the code at line 643.
Otherwise, we could:
- add a checkbox "anonymous phase2" in the phase1 screen.
- when checked, only one "transport" phase2 can be added.
What do you think ?
#4 Updated by Jim Pingle over 8 years ago
Sounds OK, though we also had reports that the Cisco VPN client would only connect with sainfo anonymous even without transport mode.
So what it might need is some more logic, if it's a single p2, use sainfo anonymous, if it's multiple p2, use the other method. A checkbox would work but may not be the best way.
#6 Updated by Jim Pingle over 8 years ago
I think that sounds right, it should do the right thing automatically then.
Not sure if we should prevent someone from adding a second p2 to an xauth tunnel or not. Probably needs testing to see if the Cisco client and/or Shrew client work with that kind of setup.
#7 Updated by David Szpunar over 8 years ago
If you're asking if multiple P2 networks should be supported then YES! I was using this regularly from Shrew and my iPhone until earlier this month when it broke and I finally reported this bug when it didn't start working again for more than a week. iPhone requires this setup (if you don't want to set up certs) including Xauth, and the iPhone IPsec client is a Cisco-branded client. I was using that and Shrew both to access multiple networks behind pfSense (several VLAN interfaces) for remote administration. I'm not familiar enough with IPsec and the source code to see why things changed, but it was working perfectly before, and I would very much like to see it continue working. The only hitch before now was that the newest upgrade to the Shrew client necessitated the fix I located at http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,30188.0.html
#8 Updated by Jim Pingle over 8 years ago
Well of course they should, but whether or not both Cisco and Shrew will work with the same config is the question. :-) If it works, great, if it doesn't, we may need that checkbox to force a certain behavior, or a warning that multiple P2s don't work with Cisco if that is the case (which is may not be, it just needs tested to verify).
#14 Updated by David Szpunar over 8 years ago
OK I added a second subnet (phase 2) entry after upgrading my firewall VM to the most recent beta (Jan 1 i386) to my Mobile IPsec tunnel, the only IPsec tunnel on this system. I was getting some System log entries like:
Jan 3 01:37:52 php: /vpn_ipsec.php: Could not determine VPN endpoint for 'Mobile IPsec'
in addition to:
Jan 3 01:37:52 php: /vpn_ipsec.php: The command '/usr/local/sbin/racoonctl -s /var/db/racoon/racoon.sock reload-config' returned exit code '1', the output was ''
and I couldn't connect, but I rechecked all tunnel configs (since I'd changed a lot in troubleshooting this earlier) and on my client and now the first VPN endpoint message seems to have gone away, but the second one about "exit code '1'" still shows up at least when I save/apply the IPsec settings.
However, racoon IS running now and the client (Shew) DOES connect, and I CAN talk to both subnets at the end of both phase2 tunnels! I don't know if the log entries are worth chasing down if it's working but if you need any additional information, I'll try to help. I just tried a third phase2 entry as well and it also works.
I also verified that I could access two of the phase2 tunnels through the iPhone using an iPhone 4 with latest firmware and the built-in IPsec client, however the LAN network didn't seem to be available when I tried pinging hosts while connected to the VPN, using the "Net Utility" iPhone app to ping. It pinged hosts in the other two subnets just fine. While connected via Shrew I was able to ping hosts in all three subnets, however. Not sure if this is a fluke or what's happening but it "mostly" works :-)
#15 Updated by Pierre POMES over 8 years ago
Thanks for the feedback.
partial answer: for the error "The command '/usr/local/sbin/racoonctl -s /var/db/racoon/racoon.sock reload-config' returned exit code '1', the output was ''", I am afraid it is a racoon problem. raconctl seems to return 1 in any case.
This is not the expected behavior according to the man page... (racoonctl should return 0 on success, and 1 on failure)
#16 Updated by David Szpunar over 8 years ago
Excellent, the iPhone access is not my priority right now though it is odd I could only get to two of the three subnets (when I did just two, they both worked). However with Shrew it all seems to be working great, regardless of the error you are saying is not expected (I can ignore it, just wanted to make sure it wasn't relevant).
#17 Updated by Pierre POMES over 8 years ago
I am curious on the third subnet problem with your iPhone. In your pfSense IPSEC logs, do you have entries like "failed to pre-process packet", "failed to get sainfo" or something else ?
I would propose that you start racoon in debug mode from a ssh terminal:
kill <pid of racoon>
racoon -F -d -v -f /var/etc/racoon.conf
(this will start racoon in foreground, and you will have logs in your ssh terminal).
Then connect with your iPhone, and generate traffic a few seconds for the problematic subnet only.
Once done, ctrl+c on racoon (and start it again normally from the services menu).
If you find any relevant information in logs, let us know !