Project

General

Profile

Actions

Todo #1438

closed

Add override for CSR request->response subject mismatch

Added by Yehuda Katz about 13 years ago. Updated almost 13 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Certificates
Target version:
Start date:
04/15/2011
Due date:
% Done:

80%

Estimated time:
Plus Target Version:
Release Notes:

Description

Just a bit of bug checking and the code that I mentioned on the mailing list will be ready (I am waiting on my CA to issue another cert).

Thoughts: another way (the proper way) to check whether a CSR and CERT match without checking the subjects.
Compare the outputs of:
openssl x509 -noout -modulus -in certificate.crt | openssl md5
openssl rsa -noout -modulus -in privateKey.key | openssl md5
openssl req -noout -modulus -in CSR.csr | openssl md5


Files

system_certmanager.patch (1.06 KB) system_certmanager.patch Yehuda Katz, 04/18/2011 02:24 PM
Actions #1

Updated by Yehuda Katz about 13 years ago

Here is the simple patch. A better one is on the way.

Actions #2

Updated by Yehuda Katz about 13 years ago

What I meant to say there is this patch fixes the problem.
I am working on a patch that will actually completely work around the problem by checking the modulus of the request and the response.

Also, I am not sure what happened to diff that the patch does not show up properly. Anyone know?

Actions #4

Updated by Chris Buechler about 13 years ago

  • Target version set to 2.0
Actions #5

Updated by Yehuda Katz almost 13 years ago

New merge request sent

Actions #6

Updated by Chris Buechler almost 13 years ago

tested this with a cert from namecheap, originally was seeing the issue described here, synced up to Yehuda's git clone and it then worked fine. Everything else looks to work as well, and the diff looks fine, needs another person to review.

Actions #7

Updated by Yehuda Katz almost 13 years ago

My semester ends in about 2-3 weeks. At that point I will look around in the code for other places where this type of validation might be useful (maybe when creating regular certificates with public/private key).

Actions #8

Updated by Yehuda Katz almost 13 years ago

I am not quite done yet, but I was looking at this ticket and there does not seem to be a way that I can update the percentage done field. I know it does not really matter, but I like to be complete if I can.

Actions #9

Updated by Jim Pingle almost 13 years ago

Yehuda - That option is only available to users with certain levels of access here. If you want to just add a note on the ticket with the % done you want, someone with access can change that for you. It's at 80% now.

On an unrelated note, when this is complete, ticket #1318 can also be closed since this will fix the problem.

Actions #10

Updated by Jim Pingle almost 13 years ago

Another note: Our repositories have moved from rcs.pfsense.org to github (https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense), so you would need to make a new fork there and apply your patch, and then request a merge again if you want to go that route.

Actions #11

Updated by Yehuda Katz almost 13 years ago

I already forked from GitHub and I am working from there.

I should have something to merge later today.

Actions #12

Updated by Yehuda Katz almost 13 years ago

I was going through the files again and I found that there are no more places in the code that need this change.
This ticket can be marked as done.
My other SSL-related ticket (#1437) goes on...

Actions #13

Updated by Chris Buechler almost 13 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved

thanks!

Actions #14

Updated by Jim Pingle almost 13 years ago

I didn't see a commit bringing this into mainline, is the patch on the ticket up to date? I just want to make sure we get the right code in.

Actions #15

Updated by Yehuda Katz almost 13 years ago

a828210b746c074c1e701a44f5f2ec3a69ba368a
2594f4010b85e5f4571ba76a69e36a16f441b4e3

Actions #16

Updated by Jim Pingle almost 13 years ago

Ah, ok. I wasn't looking back far enough in the git log. Looks good, thanks!

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF