Bug #3794
closedRe-orderable IPsec
0%
Description
Allow IPSec tunnel order to be changed much like Firewall Rules can be re-ordered. The purpose is to give one tunnel priority over another in cases where you have overlapping subnets. For example you need 192.168.100.0/24 to go to destination A and 192.168.0.0/16 to go to destination B. Currently you have to delete all tunnels and re-create them in the proper order so the /24 is listed before the /16. I would expect this to work the same as static routes or at least have the option to manual tweaking the routing. The option that seems to work is deleting the /16 VPN and adding in the /24 get it working then adding back in the /16 network. Resulting in downtime and a lot of extra work.
Thanks
Robert
Updated by Robert Middleswarth almost 10 years ago
Issue was fixed in 2.2 why marked as rejected?
Thanks
Robert
Updated by Jim Pingle almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Rejected to Duplicate
As mentioned in a previous comment on this ticket, it was rejected because it was a duplicate of #3328.